Cosmic Wonder

Cambridge researchers create tetrataenite rare-earth-free magnets in the laboratory, which could help in the transition to low-carbon technologies.

Professor Lindsay Greer (middle), Professor of Materials Science, Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge with Owain Houghton (left) and Miguel Frausto de Brito Costa (right). Photo: Graham CopeKoga

Photo: Professor Lindsay Greer (middle), Professor of Materials Science, Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge with Owain Houghton (left) and Miguel Frausto de Brito Costa (right). Photo: Graham CopeKoga

In the transition to low-carbon technologies, rare-earth elements play an important part. Rare earths such as neodymium and samarium are used in the production of high-performance permanent magnets for use within electric motors (notably in electric vehicles) and electric-power generators. Samarium is used in combination with cobalt, which is primarily mined in the Republic of Congo and other parts of Africa that are labeled conflict areas. The extraction of neodymium and samarium carries high environmental impacts and health hazards, as well as geopolitical risks, such as China's near monopoly on global production. 

Another material, tetrataenite (L10 Fe-Ni) also offers high-performance permanent-magnet properties. The only problem is that tetrataenite forms over millions of years in iron-nickel meteorites, and is only found in minute quantities within meteorites that land on earth, making extraction unfeasible.

Now a team of researchers in the Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy at the University of Cambridge together with colleagues from the Austrian Academy of Sciences and Montanuniversität in Leoben have found a new way to make tetrataenite in the laboratory, which doesn’t require millions of years of cooling.

Professor Lindsay Greer explains that the discovery came about while researching metallic glass and the mechanical properties of iron-nickel alloys containing small amounts of phosphorus. On closer inspection, Greer and his team noticed an interesting diffraction pattern indicating an ordered atomic structure, similar to that found in meteoritic tetrataenite. “Inside these materials we observed the expected tree-like microstructure called dendrites. In most cases, it would have ended there. But the electron microscope showed an interesting Fe-Ni phase with an ordered atomic structure similar to that found in meteoritic tetrataenite,” said first author Yurii Ivanov, who completed the work while at Cambridge, and is now based at the Italian Institute of Technology in Genoa.

Researchers found that phosphorus, which is present in meteorites, allows the iron and nickel atoms to move faster, enabling them to form the necessary ordered stacking without waiting for millions of years.

Synthetic tetrataenite offers the potential of rare-earth-free permanent magnets made from elements which are found in abundance in the Earth’s crust and avoid the need to extract a huge amount of material to get a small volume of rare earths.

Greer says that “no special treatment is required, and the end product can be produced within seconds, without having to wait millions of years for tetrataenite to form." Research is still ongoing to determine whether it will be suitable for high-performance magnets.

Currently the global permanent magnets market, valued at USD 19.14 billion in 2021 1 is divided into expensive high-performance magnets, or cheaper ferrite magnets, with few products in the mid-market price sector. Greer explains that synthetic tetrataenite would fill the mid-sector market gap, offering mass-produced high-performance magnets at an affordable cost point.

Previous attempts by a team in France in 1962 to make tetrataenite in the laboratory relied on extreme methods, such as neutron irradiation and not suitable for mass production. 

A patent application on the technology has been filed by Cambridge Enterprise, the University’s commercialisation arm, and the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

The research was supported in part by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and Seventh Framework Programme, and the Austrian Science Fund.

The results are reported in the journal Advanced Science:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.202204315

1. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/permanent-magnets-industry

The research was conducted with teams at the following institutions:

University of Cambridge:
Yurii Ivanov
(now in Italian Institute of Technology in Genoa)
Professor Lindsay Greer

Dr Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos

Owain Houghton

Miguel Frausto de Brito Costa

Austrian Academy of Sciences - Leoben:
Dr Baran Sarac

Dr Sergey Ketov
Professor Jürgen Eckert


Cranfield University:
Dr Konstantinos Georgarakis

Share this article:

Themes

Publications

Discover our Journals & Books

From Darwin’s paper on evolution to the development of stem cell research, publications from the Society continue to shape the scientific landscape.

Membership

Join the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Become a Fellow of the Society and enjoy the benefits that membership brings. Membership costs £20 per year.

Join today

Upcoming Events

Show All

03

02

To Bend or to Break?  — new views on the hardening of metals

Professor Lindsay Greer

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term G.I. Taylor Lecture

Kipling’s “Iron‒Cold Iron‒is master of them all” captures the familiar importance of metals as structural materials.  Yet common metals are not necessarily hard; they can become so when deformed.  This phenomenon, strain hardening, was first explained by G. I. Taylor in 1934.  Ninety years on from this pioneering work on dislocation theory, we explore the deformation of metals when dislocations do not exist, that is when the metals are non-crystalline.  These amorphous metals have record-breaking combinations of properties.  They behave very differently from the metals that Taylor studied, but we do find phenomena for which his work (in a dramatically different context) is directly relevant.

View Details

17

02

Why there’s no such thing as “the” scientific advice

Professor Stephen John

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term

During the Covid-19 pandemic, U.K. policy-makers claimed to be "following the science". Many commentators objected that the government did not live up to this aim. Others worried that policy-makers ought not blindly "follow" science, because this involves an abdication of responsibility. In this talk, I consider a third, even more fundamental concern: that there is no such thing as "the" science. Drawing on the case of adolescent vaccination against Covid-19, I argue that the best that any scientific advisory group can do is to offer a partial perspective on reality. In turn, this has important implications for how we think about science and politics. 

View Details